Texas Proposition 12 essays

Texas Proposition 12 essays Bill HJR 3 from the 78th regular session states proposing a constitutional amendment concerning civil lawsuits against doctors and health care providers, and other actions, authorizing the legislature to determine limitations on Bill HJR 3, also known as proposition 12 on the September 2003 ballot was an issue with great intensity on both sides of the spectrum. The premise of the bill was to limit non-economic damages from malpractice and other health care related issues to $250,000. Non-economic damages are also referred to as punitive damages, which at times have seen judgments upwards of ten million dollars. This poses serious problems for physicians attempting to practice medicine in Texas. With lottery sized rewards being thrown out left and right, trial lawyers feel that they can afford to take a shot at many cases, and hope one scores the jackpot. Consequently, malpractice insurance for doctors in this state have risen to phenomenal highs, and have forced doctors to literally abandon certain services, higher risk cases that leave patients with no other alternative, or even abandon their whole practice all together. Physicians have also limited the Medicaid and Medicare that they take, and their acceptance of complicated problems. If things continue like this, then many patients will have to seek care in distant cities. Proposition 12 is important because it instills lost confidence that physicians once had. It allows them to focus on their practice and continue to see patients with all sorts of issues, from minor to major complications without worrying about the severe repercussions of a misjudgment. After all, physicians are here to better ones well-being and ensure that they are in optimal health, despite what the trial lawyers try to spoon feed the public. Because proposition 12 created such a fervor, it produced extremists for and against the issue. Furthermore, the notio ...